Grace Comes First

Prepared for the Work of Love

January 25, 2012, 1:09 am

Prepared for the Work of Love

Tags: First Presbyterian Church San Rafael California Marin Rev. Sam Alexander progressive integral christianity evolutionary 5thandE.org Bible sermon gracecomesfirst patheos expert
Category: Sermons | Comment

Where’s My Pillar of Cloud?

January 8, 2012, 11:30 pm

Where Is My Cloud? (Audio – right-click to download – approx 8 MB)

Category: Sermons | Comment

Power and Salvation

December 11, 2011, 4:14 pm

Power and Salvation (Audio, right-click to download, approximately 9 mb)

Tags: First Presbyterian Church San Rafael California Marin Rev. Sam Alexander progressive integral Christianity evolutionary 5thandE.org Bible sermon gracecomesfirst patheos expert

Powered by Qumana

Category: Uncategorized | Comment

A Review of Integral Christianity by Paul Smith

November 28, 2011, 9:12 pm

I’d like to be able to thank Rev. Smith for taking a stab at describing "Integral Christianity." We do after all need to reach for meaning beyond the orthodox – liberal – neo-Orthodox debate which has mired the church in endless, pointless controversy, controversy which has eviscerated our congregations at the very time our society most needs communities that foster growth and transformation.

The trouble is, he falls so far short of an “integral” expression of Christianity that he obscures the generosity of our faith. Maybe I wouldn’t be so pointed if he hadn’t put “Integral Christianity” in the title. But he did, and now some poor, unsuspecting souls will think that his book offers an integral expression of Christianity when, except perhaps in some small way, it does not.

What’s an integral level of development and who cares? Let me do this quickly. First, you have tribal cultures with a magic worldview, who begat nation-states and they have a mythic-traditional worldview, they begat a culture with a modernist worldview, who in turn begatted a post-modern worldview. Each of them have one thing in common – they all think they are right and the others are wrong. Integral thinks everyone, including themselves, is partly right. They see genuine value in each level of development. Wow is that oversimplified.

Paul has wandered into “integral’s” shadow. All of us wander in there from time to time so I don’t mean for this to sound like a character assassination. We read, or maybe imbibe is a better word, Ken Wilber’s work on integral theory and then we confuse our cognitive apprehension of the theory itself with our own supposed rise to an integral level of development.

I figure it is safer to assume that I’m two levels down from where I think I am. And even if I do think there are certain areas of my life and understanding, certain lines of development, where I have “risen to integral,” I’ve got to assume the other areas, the other lines of development are dragging me down.

Put another way, the shadow of integral is arrogance, (though I mean that in the best possible way). And it shows up big time in Rev. Smith’s approach to the Scriptures, (other places too, but I thought I’d focus on this one first). The Bible is an ancient document written by authors flying at several, “lower” levels of development. I mean let’s face it, the book is a little strange – it has magic blood rituals, sexual violence, strange customs and laws, the modern mind has legitimate reason to question its relevance, and so we Christians got some splain’n to do if we want to use the Bible in any productive way.

So here’s how Paul begins his effort to explain how the Bible can be read within an integral frame. “In an integral understanding, the Bible is a fascinating account of the evolutionary progress of the spiritual path.” Really? It is an historical artifact? That’s integral? He notes that some very modern people, (not him, he’s integral don’t you know), “toss the Bible out as uninteresting and irrelevant.” An historical artifact is my idea of irrelevant.

Now at about this moment some of you may be thinking, “Oh, here it comes, a traditionalist defense from someone who can’t bear to jettison his mythic framework. Poor, pathetic soul; let’s hope one day he wakes up.” Hang in with me for a bit; I might surprise you.

Where to begin? Paul’s basic problem is splain’n away the violence of the Old Testament. It bugs him. (page 81). Understand, I have some sympathy for that.

He begins to spin his tale by telling us that the early contributors to the text of the Bible were operating out of a warrior level of consciousness. Well, OK, I can agree with that. The next level of consciousness emerges when Moses comes on the scene with his hierarchical model of leadership and his God given laws – never mind that there is some serious question among scholars about whether Moses ever existed. But OK, I think it is fair to say that a traditional worldview emerged as part and parcel of the formation of the Bible. In fact most scholars would agree that the thing was first put together around the time Israel formed as a nation-state – surely a traditional move.

The trouble Rev. Smith explains, is that elements of the warrior God, with his warring ways and magic powers, remained in the text.

Then the nation-state of Israel met hard times. Invaded from the East, pressured from the South, a government rife with corruption, the Hebrew prophets “heard the call of the Spirit for the people to evolve toward a higher spiritual path. They cried out against oppression and urged compassion.” Nice, but still they were left with their mythic framework; they were still burdened with the vestiges of their warrior God. And so the situation remained until, Smith would have us understand, our hero – Integral Jesus – comes on the scene.

Integral Jesus, far superior to anyone else, tells us to love our enemies and pray for those who persecute us, thus dealing the death blow to our old nemesis, the warrior God.

Of course he still has some splain’n to do because some of the New Testament seems still to carry the vestiges of a Warrior God. Well, that’s only a problem for traditional interpreters who, not having the benefit of an integral understanding of the situation, give equal weight to all the passages of the New Testament. “A statement by Jesus in the gospels is given the same weight as a statement by Paul in one of his letters.”

OK, now I’m exasperated. Has he read any of the literature on the several quests for the “historical Jesus?” Yes, he has. He talks about it at the beginning of the book. Good heavens man, we don’t have any idea what Jesus said or didn’t say. (Unless you want to transcend, but reject modern scholarship’s insight into the text.) The “words of Jesus” are placed in the Gospels by people who were interpreting the meaning of his life, death and resurrection, (whatever that was or wasn’t – but that’s another essay). That is what the Apostle Paul was doing. Why shouldn’t they get equal weight?

But Paul, (the author, not the Apostle), does know that such editing of the voice of Jesus takes place. For you see, there are moments in the New Testament when Jesus sounds like a warrior God. This is a real problem if your hero is Integral Jesus. What is to be done? Answer: such passages are obviously “warrior level revisions of Jesus and his teaching,” (p. 92).

So here is how Paul Smith describes a modernist view of the Bible: “The Bible is often viewed suspiciously as a relic from the past. It may be basically discarded or radically reinterpreted. Thomas Jefferson simply cut out the ‘irrational’ parts of the Bible to produce a truly ‘holey’ Bible.” Smith has given us a modernist view of Scripture, NOT an integral view.

But that’s not my real problem. My real problem is that, intended or not, the book becomes an apologetic for the superiority of the Christian scriptures. We after all, have Integral Jesus, and the rest of you are out of luck. And he bases this apologetic on his own editing, divined from his lofty integral perch. Second, it makes Paul Smith the final arbiter of truth. Integral shadow: arrogance.

No Murder

November 15, 2011, 10:29 pm

No Murder (Audio, right-click to download, approximately 9 mb)

Tags: First Presbyterian Church, San Rafael, California, Marin, Rev. Sam Alexander, progressive integral Christianity, evolutionary, 5thandE.org, Bible, sermon, gracecomesfirst, patheos, expert

Powered by Qumana

Category: Uncategorized | Comment

An Open Letter to Evangelicals, (sort of)

November 5, 2011, 3:46 am

I need a little help over here on the dark side in liberal, post-liberal, or whatever you want to call it, land.

I guess it all started when my wife died and I realized one of two things was true: either the God I’d been talking about lo those many years – the Father God who intervenes in our lives whenever He deems it prudent so as to serve His inscrutable ends – either that God does not exist, or that God hates me, (and a whole bunch of other people too). There is a kind of cognitive dissonance in that, seeing as how God is love. And so it was that the first of the cords making up the old rope bed which had been holding me up as I slept, unraveled. Then just like in Tolstoy’s dream, the others followed until finally I was suspended on one lonely rope – the perennially ill-defined love of God. But suspended over what? Answer: a deep, dark, scary abyss.

Still, there was that one rope, the love of God, and so I balanced my life upon it, so to speak, and followed it out until I found it was attached to a massive white pillar, the good, true and beautiful presence of God’s creative mystery. Naturally the pillar too was suspended over the abyss, but the extraordinary brilliance of the thing offered courage and hope.

So I did what a few people do when the underpinnings of their traditional faith unravel before their very eyes I became a liberal, God forbid. The trouble is that most people do not become liberals at that moment, most people become uninterested. That would be OK with me except for the fact that a society operating without the meaning gleaned from a walk of faith, devolves; it runs seriously a’muck. And so we find ourselves at a moment when humanity must change or die, and most people live outside a context of meaning; most people have no community of transformation. I think you’ll agree that’s a problem.

That’s why I need some help over here on the dark side. For it seems that my new liberal friends left more than their theological constructs behind when the ropes came unraveled. It seems as though we’ve lost a certain zeal for our faith. It’s understandable really, we’re at a disadvantage because if you are liberal, then you aren’t so sure of yourself when you talk about God, which is good, because we really don’t “know” anything, but it does mean you can’t yell as loud as an evangelical. And so we’ve just gotten in the habit of being quiet about our faith; it’s better than engaging in endless, un-winnable debates. Trouble is, that means we’ve gotten out of the habit of describing and then sharing our faith convictions with the world around us. We show our love through the work we do and many people think we have good hearts, but they don’t know why. They usually assume its because we believe what you believe, but they don’t want to tell us what they think, because they don’t want to offend us. So they stick with their assumptions about what Christians believe and refuse to ever come near any church.

As a result, I think we all need to face the fact that the church is unalterably, inevitably drifting into the abyss and because of that, I need a little help over here on the dark side. (I know you may want to argue this point, but really, look at the trends, I’m right.)

First, I need people who believe that Christian faith is a path of transformation. I need people who believe that God is calling us to growth and development and that God’s grace provides the engine for such growth. If I remember correctly, you all believe that. I do too.

Second, I need people who think it is extraordinarily important for us to share our faith with those who have no path of transformation. You do that all the time. (I’d hasten to add that I think it is also important to enter into discussions with people who are walking a different path of transformation as well; those conversations challenge all of us to develop and grow – but enough of my liberal agenda.)

Finally, I need some people who believe, that the Bible has something to offer. Understand, I don’t think it’s a magic book, but for well over three thousand years the Spirit of God has lived within the community of this book, forming us and shaping our conversations. (Understand I think God lives in other communities with other “books” as well – oops there goes that liberal agenda again.) Our forbearers in this “community of the book,” – the writers, the editors, and all the believers who have validated the text for thousands of years – were in the end, not so much speaking truth, as they were pointing towards truth, using the only language, the only worldview they had available to them at the time.

So now too many modern Christians think they can just decide which parts of the text we will reject as a product of an ancient (and therefore assumed inferior) culture, when what we really need to be doing is asking ourselves what each and every chapter and verse might be pointing toward. We need to do that with all of it, not just the parts we like. (This isn’t just a liberal thing; you all do it too.) I mean, OK, I’m pretty sure there was no theophany on top of Mount Olympus, (oops, that’s Sinai, or Horeb take your pick), but I’d sure like to know what experience of the Divine led the authors of the text to describe things that way. You see what I’m getting at.

So there it is; I need a little help over here on the dark side. I need people who think life is about transformation, who think it is incumbent upon us to share our faith, and who think the Bible is pointing towards the truth of God’s love so that we can all bring a little more clarity to a world sick with yearning for just that, Gods creative love.

We can do this, we really can, because Arthur Gossip was right. In the midst of the darkness, the “moon rises and throws a lane of gold to us across the blackness and heaving of the tumbling waters,” and as that light emerges it becomes brighter and brighter still, until you can look into the abyss and know you could fall forever and never escape the loving arms of God.

Anyway, I need a little help over here. Trust me, it is not as dark as you think.